Correlation Between Microsoft and FactSet Research
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and FactSet Research at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and FactSet Research into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and FactSet Research Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and FactSet Research and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of FactSet Research. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and FactSet Research.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and FactSet Research
-0.78 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and FactSet is -0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and FactSet Research Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FactSet Research Systems and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with FactSet Research. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FactSet Research Systems has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and FactSet Research go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and FactSet Research
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.81 times more return on investment than FactSet Research. However, Microsoft is 1.23 times less risky than FactSet Research. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FactSet Research Systems is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest 45,887 in Microsoft on May 17, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 6,361 from holding Microsoft or generate 13.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. FactSet Research Systems
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
FactSet Research Systems |
Microsoft and FactSet Research Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and FactSet Research
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and FactSet Research positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, FactSet Research can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FactSet Research will offset losses from the drop in FactSet Research's long position.Microsoft vs. Palantir Technologies Class | Microsoft vs. Crowdstrike Holdings | Microsoft vs. Oracle | Microsoft vs. CoreWeave, Class A |
FactSet Research vs. Dun Bradstreet Holdings | FactSet Research vs. Moodys | FactSet Research vs. MSCI Inc | FactSet Research vs. Intercontinental Exchange |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.
Other Complementary Tools
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |