Microsoft Correlations
MSFT Stock | USD 453.10 3.96 0.88% |
The current 90-days correlation between Microsoft and Palo Alto Networks is 0.72 (i.e., Poor diversification). The correlation of Microsoft is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random.
Microsoft Correlation With Market
Poor diversification
The correlation between Microsoft and DJI is 0.79 (i.e., Poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Microsoft | Build AI portfolio with Microsoft Stock |
Moving together with Microsoft Stock
0.84 | ZS | Zscaler | PairCorr |
0.89 | VRNS | Varonis Systems | PairCorr |
0.66 | FTNT | Fortinet | PairCorr |
0.79 | ODD | ODDITY Tech | PairCorr |
0.8 | PAY | Paymentus Holdings | PairCorr |
0.7 | PGY | Pagaya Technologies Tech Boost | PairCorr |
Moving against Microsoft Stock
Related Correlations Analysis
Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Microsoft Stock performing well and Microsoft Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Microsoft's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW | 1.97 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 2.68 | 3.51 | 17.99 | |||
PATH | 2.54 | 0.08 | 0.00 | (0.01) | 0.00 | 4.77 | 22.95 | |||
SQ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
ADBE | 1.58 | (0.03) | 0.00 | (0.10) | 0.00 | 3.30 | 18.02 | |||
CRWD | 3.08 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 3.76 | 6.38 | 20.96 | |||
SPLK | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
PLTR | 4.34 | 0.52 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 5.67 | 7.85 | 31.05 | |||
ZS | 2.32 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 3.21 | 3.61 | 17.84 | |||
ORCL | 2.45 | 0.05 | 0.00 | (0.04) | 0.00 | 4.58 | 16.71 | |||
NET | 3.04 | 0.06 | 0.00 | (0.04) | 0.00 | 5.62 | 21.78 |
Microsoft Corporate Management
Hossein Nowbar | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Brett Iversen | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Christopher Young | Strategy Development | Profile | |
Takeshi Numoto | Executive Officer | Profile |