Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Microsoft

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Microsoft at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Microsoft into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Microsoft, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Microsoft and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Microsoft. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Microsoft.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Microsoft

0.12

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Microsoft

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Microsoft is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Microsoft in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microsoft and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Microsoft. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microsoft has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Microsoft go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Microsoft

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.5 times less return on investment than Microsoft. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 1.55 times less risky than Microsoft. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microsoft is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  24,341  in Microsoft on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17,958  from holding Microsoft or generate 73.78% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Microsoft

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Microsoft

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Microsoft

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Microsoft positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Microsoft can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will offset losses from the drop in Microsoft's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble and Microsoft pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.