Correlation Between Pitney Bowes and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pitney Bowes and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pitney Bowes and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pitney Bowes and Bank of America, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pitney Bowes and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pitney Bowes with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pitney Bowes and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for Pitney Bowes and Bank of America

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Pitney and Bank is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pitney Bowes and Bank of America in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of America and Pitney Bowes is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pitney Bowes are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of America has no effect on the direction of Pitney Bowes i.e., Pitney Bowes and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pitney Bowes and Bank of America

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Pitney Bowes is expected to generate 4.61 times more return on investment than Bank of America. However, Pitney Bowes is 4.61 times more volatile than Bank of America. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of America is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  888.00  in Pitney Bowes on May 7, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  265.00  from holding Pitney Bowes or generate 29.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pitney Bowes  vs.  Bank of America

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pitney Bowes 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Pitney Bowes are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak fundamental drivers, Pitney Bowes demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Mild

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pitney Bowes and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pitney Bowes and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pitney Bowes and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pitney Bowes position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind Pitney Bowes and Bank of America pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated