Correlation Between L Abbett and Mfs Emerging
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both L Abbett and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining L Abbett and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between L Abbett Growth and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on L Abbett and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in L Abbett with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of L Abbett and Mfs Emerging.
Diversification Opportunities for L Abbett and Mfs Emerging
0.73 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between LGLSX and Mfs is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding L Abbett Growth and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and L Abbett is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on L Abbett Growth are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of L Abbett i.e., L Abbett and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between L Abbett and Mfs Emerging
Assuming the 90 days horizon L Abbett Growth is expected to generate 3.51 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, L Abbett is 3.51 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 5,041 in L Abbett Growth on July 2, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 645.00 from holding L Abbett Growth or generate 12.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 98.41% |
Values | Daily Returns |
L Abbett Growth vs. Mfs Emerging Markets
Performance |
Timeline |
L Abbett Growth |
Mfs Emerging Markets |
L Abbett and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with L Abbett and Mfs Emerging
The main advantage of trading using opposite L Abbett and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if L Abbett position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.L Abbett vs. Delaware Minnesota High Yield | L Abbett vs. Artisan High Income | L Abbett vs. T Rowe Price | L Abbett vs. T Rowe Price |
Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor | Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor | Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor | Mfs Emerging vs. Mfs Prudent Investor |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.
Other Complementary Tools
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |