Meta Platforms Correlations
| FB2A Stock | 572.10 3.40 0.59% |
The current 90-days correlation between Meta Platforms and Meta Platforms is 0.74 (i.e., Poor diversification). The correlation of Meta Platforms is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Meta Platforms Correlation With Market
Significant diversification
The correlation between Meta Platforms and DJI is 0.09 (i.e., Significant diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Meta Platforms and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Meta |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Meta Platforms could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Meta Platforms when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Meta Platforms - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Meta Platforms to buy it.
Moving together with Meta Stock
| 0.84 | ABEA | Alphabet Class A | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | ABEA | Alphabet Class A | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | ABEC | Alphabet | PairCorr |
| 0.98 | FB2A | Meta Platforms | PairCorr |
| 0.79 | SID | State Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | W8V | Bank of China | PairCorr |
| 0.88 | APC | Apple Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.75 | HIP | Park Hotels Resorts | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | WX7 | Corporate Office Pro | PairCorr |
| 0.72 | 2T9A | TRAINLINE PLC LS | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | RC2 | RCM TECHNOLOGIES | PairCorr |
| 0.75 | HI91 | Hilton Worldwide Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | EN3 | Enbridge | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | M5V | EHEALTH | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | QAN | Qantas Airways | PairCorr |
| 0.73 | PPB | Flutter Entertainment PLC | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | 4GE | Grupo Mxico SAB | PairCorr |
| 0.86 | 0XHR | Xenia Hotels Resorts | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | WD5A | TRAVEL LEISURE DL | PairCorr |
Moving against Meta Stock
Related Correlations Analysis
| 0.99 | 0.81 | -0.01 | 0.85 | 0.49 | ABEA | ||
| 0.99 | 0.81 | -0.01 | 0.84 | 0.51 | ABEC | ||
| 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.98 | 0.51 | FB2A | ||
| -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.16 | 0.13 | -0.25 | NNN1 | ||
| 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 0.51 | FB2A | ||
| 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.51 | -0.25 | 0.51 | 6Z1 | ||
| Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Meta Stock performing well and Meta Platforms Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Meta Platforms' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABEA | 1.16 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 1.71 | 1.27 | 4.28 | 10.85 | |||
| ABEC | 1.25 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.88 | 1.16 | 4.94 | 9.66 | |||
| FB2A | 1.42 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.35 | 1.54 | 3.09 | 7.59 | |||
| NNN1 | 2.01 | 0.29 | 0.11 | (1.70) | 2.22 | 5.37 | 15.11 | |||
| FB2A | 1.19 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.99 | 1.35 | 2.83 | 7.25 | |||
| 6Z1 | 1.63 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 1.71 | 4.00 | 10.12 |
Be your own money manager
Our tools can tell you how much better you can do entering a position in Meta Platforms without increasing your portfolio risk or giving up the expected return. As an individual investor, you need to find a reliable way to track all your investment portfolios. However, your requirements will often be based on how much of the process you decide to do yourself. In addition to allowing all investors analytical transparency into all their portfolios, our tools can evaluate risk-adjusted returns of your individual positions relative to your overall portfolio.Did you try this?
Run Portfolio Optimization Now
Portfolio OptimizationCompute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk |
| All Next | Launch Module |
Meta Platforms Corporate Management
Elected by the shareholders, the Meta Platforms' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Meta Platforms inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Meta. The board's role is to monitor Meta Platforms' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Meta Platforms' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Meta Platforms' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Atish Banerjea | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Andrew Bosworth | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Deborah Crawford | VP Relations | Profile | |
| Christopher Cox | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Mark Zuckerberg | Chairman Founder | Profile | |
| Javier Olivan | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Marne Levine | Chief Officer | Profile |