This module uses fundamental data of Interface to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Interface M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Interface Piotroski F Score and Interface Altman Z Score analysis.
At present, Interface's Long Term Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Net Debt To EBITDA is expected to grow to 3.61, whereas Net Debt is forecasted to decline to about 321.3 M. At present, Interface's Days Sales Outstanding is projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Free Cash Flow Yield is expected to grow to 0.17, whereas Dividend Yield is forecasted to decline to 0.
At this time, it appears that Interface is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Interface's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Interface executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Interface's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Interface's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Interface's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Interface in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Interface's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Depreciation And Amortization
33.65 Million
At present, Interface's Depreciation And Amortization is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
Interface Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Interface. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Interface's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Interface's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Interface Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Interface's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Interface using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Interface based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Interface Stock
When determining whether Interface is a strong investment it is important to analyze Interface's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Interface's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Interface Stock, refer to the following important reports:
For information on how to trade Interface Stock refer to our How to Trade Interface Stock guide.You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Is Commercial Services & Supplies space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Interface. If investors know Interface will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Interface listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.414
Dividend Share
0.04
Earnings Share
1.13
Revenue Per Share
21.87
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.052
The market value of Interface is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Interface that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Interface's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Interface's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Interface's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Interface's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Interface's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Interface is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Interface's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.