Correlation Between White Mountains and Palomar Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both White Mountains and Palomar Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining White Mountains and Palomar Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between White Mountains Insurance and Palomar Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on White Mountains and Palomar Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in White Mountains with a short position of Palomar Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of White Mountains and Palomar Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for White Mountains and Palomar Holdings

0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between White and Palomar is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding White Mountains Insurance and Palomar Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Palomar Holdings and White Mountains is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on White Mountains Insurance are associated (or correlated) with Palomar Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Palomar Holdings has no effect on the direction of White Mountains i.e., White Mountains and Palomar Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between White Mountains and Palomar Holdings

Considering the 90-day investment horizon White Mountains is expected to generate 2.51 times less return on investment than Palomar Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, White Mountains Insurance is 1.66 times less risky than Palomar Holdings. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Palomar Holdings is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,667  in Palomar Holdings on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,851  from holding Palomar Holdings or generate 85.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

White Mountains Insurance  vs.  Palomar Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
White Mountains Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in White Mountains Insurance are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very abnormal basic indicators, White Mountains displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Palomar Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Palomar Holdings are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively unfluctuating primary indicators, Palomar Holdings may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

White Mountains and Palomar Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with White Mountains and Palomar Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite White Mountains and Palomar Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if White Mountains position performs unexpectedly, Palomar Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Palomar Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Palomar Holdings' long position.
The idea behind White Mountains Insurance and Palomar Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios