Correlation Between Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Moderate and Fpa Crescent, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation with a short position of Fpa Crescent. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent.
Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent
1.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
No risk reduction
The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Fpa is 1.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Moderate and Fpa Crescent in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fpa Crescent and Strategic Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Moderate are associated (or correlated) with Fpa Crescent. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fpa Crescent has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation i.e., Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent
Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation is expected to generate 1.14 times less return on investment than Fpa Crescent. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Strategic Allocation Moderate is 1.09 times less risky than Fpa Crescent. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fpa Crescent is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 4,024 in Fpa Crescent on May 6, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 273.00 from holding Fpa Crescent or generate 6.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Strategic Allocation Moderate vs. Fpa Crescent
Performance |
Timeline |
Strategic Allocation |
Fpa Crescent |
Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent
The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation and Fpa Crescent positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Fpa Crescent can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fpa Crescent will offset losses from the drop in Fpa Crescent's long position.The idea behind Strategic Allocation Moderate and Fpa Crescent pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Fpa Crescent vs. Wesmark Government Bond | Fpa Crescent vs. Short Term Government Fund | Fpa Crescent vs. Us Government Securities | Fpa Crescent vs. Fidelity Series Government |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.
Other Complementary Tools
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements |