Correlation Between SenesTech and LogicMark
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SenesTech and LogicMark at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SenesTech and LogicMark into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SenesTech and LogicMark, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SenesTech and LogicMark and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SenesTech with a short position of LogicMark. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SenesTech and LogicMark.
Diversification Opportunities for SenesTech and LogicMark
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between SenesTech and LogicMark is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SenesTech and LogicMark in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LogicMark and SenesTech is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SenesTech are associated (or correlated) with LogicMark. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LogicMark has no effect on the direction of SenesTech i.e., SenesTech and LogicMark go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between SenesTech and LogicMark
If you would invest 396.00 in SenesTech on April 20, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 64.00 from holding SenesTech or generate 16.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 5.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
SenesTech vs. LogicMark
Performance |
Timeline |
SenesTech |
LogicMark |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Very Weak
Weak | Strong |
SenesTech and LogicMark Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with SenesTech and LogicMark
The main advantage of trading using opposite SenesTech and LogicMark positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SenesTech position performs unexpectedly, LogicMark can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LogicMark will offset losses from the drop in LogicMark's long position.SenesTech vs. General Environmental Management | SenesTech vs. Core Molding Technologies | SenesTech vs. Balchem | SenesTech vs. NewMarket |
LogicMark vs. Guardforce AI Co | LogicMark vs. Knightscope | LogicMark vs. Bridger Aerospace Group | LogicMark vs. Iveda Solutions |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..
Other Complementary Tools
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |