Correlation Between Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderately Servative Balanced and Intermediate Government Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderately Conservative with a short position of Intermediate Government. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Moderately and Intermediate is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderately Servative Balanced and Intermediate Government Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Intermediate Government and Moderately Conservative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderately Servative Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Intermediate Government. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Intermediate Government has no effect on the direction of Moderately Conservative i.e., Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderately Servative Balanced is expected to generate 3.72 times more return on investment than Intermediate Government. However, Moderately Conservative is 3.72 times more volatile than Intermediate Government Bond. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Intermediate Government Bond is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,095  in Moderately Servative Balanced on May 8, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  81.00  from holding Moderately Servative Balanced or generate 7.4% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Moderately Servative Balanced  vs.  Intermediate Government Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Moderately Conservative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Moderately Servative Balanced are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Moderately Conservative may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.
Intermediate Government 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Intermediate Government Bond are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Intermediate Government is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderately Conservative and Intermediate Government positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderately Conservative position performs unexpectedly, Intermediate Government can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Intermediate Government will offset losses from the drop in Intermediate Government's long position.
The idea behind Moderately Servative Balanced and Intermediate Government Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data