Correlation Between Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Large Capitalization Growth and Aggressive Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Large Capitalization with a short position of Aggressive Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced

0.99
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Large and Aggressive is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Large Capitalization Growth and Aggressive Balanced Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aggressive Balanced and Large Capitalization is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Large Capitalization Growth are associated (or correlated) with Aggressive Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aggressive Balanced has no effect on the direction of Large Capitalization i.e., Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced

Assuming the 90 days horizon Large Capitalization Growth is expected to generate 1.8 times more return on investment than Aggressive Balanced. However, Large Capitalization is 1.8 times more volatile than Aggressive Balanced Allocation. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aggressive Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  518.00  in Large Capitalization Growth on May 12, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  62.00  from holding Large Capitalization Growth or generate 11.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Large Capitalization Growth  vs.  Aggressive Balanced Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Large Capitalization 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Large Capitalization Growth are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Large Capitalization may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.
Aggressive Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Aggressive Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Large Capitalization and Aggressive Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Large Capitalization position performs unexpectedly, Aggressive Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aggressive Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Aggressive Balanced's long position.
The idea behind Large Capitalization Growth and Aggressive Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance