Correlation Between Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed and Crossmark Steward Equity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dreyfus/standish with a short position of Crossmark Steward. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward.
Diversification Opportunities for Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward
0.45 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark is 0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed and Crossmark Steward Equity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Crossmark Steward Equity and Dreyfus/standish is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed are associated (or correlated) with Crossmark Steward. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Crossmark Steward Equity has no effect on the direction of Dreyfus/standish i.e., Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward
Assuming the 90 days horizon Dreyfus/standish is expected to generate 2.95 times less return on investment than Crossmark Steward. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed is 1.97 times less risky than Crossmark Steward. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Crossmark Steward Equity is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,721 in Crossmark Steward Equity on February 12, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 105.00 from holding Crossmark Steward Equity or generate 3.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed vs. Crossmark Steward Equity
Performance |
Timeline |
Dreyfusstandish Global |
Crossmark Steward Equity |
Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward
The main advantage of trading using opposite Dreyfus/standish and Crossmark Steward positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dreyfus/standish position performs unexpectedly, Crossmark Steward can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crossmark Steward will offset losses from the drop in Crossmark Steward's long position.Dreyfus/standish vs. Calvert Bond Portfolio | Dreyfus/standish vs. Versatile Bond Portfolio | Dreyfus/standish vs. Flexible Bond Portfolio | Dreyfus/standish vs. Doubleline Total Return |
Crossmark Steward vs. Us Government Securities | Crossmark Steward vs. Alpine Ultra Short | Crossmark Steward vs. Us Government Securities | Crossmark Steward vs. Thornburg Intermediate Municipal |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |