Correlation Between Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Qs Moderate Growth and Catalystexceed Defined Shield, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Qs Moderate with a short position of Catalyst/exceed Defined. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined.

Diversification Opportunities for Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between SCGCX and Catalyst/exceed is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Qs Moderate Growth and Catalystexceed Defined Shield in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Catalyst/exceed Defined and Qs Moderate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Qs Moderate Growth are associated (or correlated) with Catalyst/exceed Defined. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Catalyst/exceed Defined has no effect on the direction of Qs Moderate i.e., Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined

Assuming the 90 days horizon Qs Moderate Growth is expected to generate 1.3 times more return on investment than Catalyst/exceed Defined. However, Qs Moderate is 1.3 times more volatile than Catalystexceed Defined Shield. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Catalystexceed Defined Shield is currently generating about 0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,688  in Qs Moderate Growth on May 14, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  94.00  from holding Qs Moderate Growth or generate 5.57% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

Qs Moderate Growth  vs.  Catalystexceed Defined Shield

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Qs Moderate Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Qs Moderate Growth are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Qs Moderate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Catalyst/exceed Defined 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Catalystexceed Defined Shield are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Catalyst/exceed Defined is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined

The main advantage of trading using opposite Qs Moderate and Catalyst/exceed Defined positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Qs Moderate position performs unexpectedly, Catalyst/exceed Defined can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Catalyst/exceed Defined will offset losses from the drop in Catalyst/exceed Defined's long position.
The idea behind Qs Moderate Growth and Catalystexceed Defined Shield pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets