Correlation Between Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderately Aggressive with a short position of Conservative Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced

1.0

Correlation Coefficient

Moderately Aggressive  Conservative Balanced

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Moderately and Conservative is 1.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced Allocati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Conservative Balanced and Moderately Aggressive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderately Aggressive Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Conservative Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Conservative Balanced has no effect on the direction of Moderately Aggressive i.e., Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderately Aggressive Balanced is expected to generate 1.42 times more return on investment than Conservative Balanced. However, Moderately Aggressive is 1.42 times more volatile than Conservative Balanced Allocation. It trades about 0.36 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Conservative Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.37 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,118  in Moderately Aggressive Balanced on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  140.00  from holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced or generate 12.52% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Moderately Aggressive Balanced  vs.  Conservative Balanced Allocati

Moderately Aggressive

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Moderately Aggressive Balanced are ranked lower than 28 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Moderately Aggressive may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Conservative Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Conservative Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 29 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Conservative Balanced may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Pair Trading with Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderately Aggressive and Conservative Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderately Aggressive position performs unexpectedly, Conservative Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Conservative Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Conservative Balanced's long position.

The idea behind Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Conservative Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.