Correlation Between Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Guidepath Managed Futures, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderately Aggressive with a short position of Guidepath Managed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed

0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Moderately and Guidepath is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Guidepath Managed Futures in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidepath Managed Futures and Moderately Aggressive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderately Aggressive Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Guidepath Managed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidepath Managed Futures has no effect on the direction of Moderately Aggressive i.e., Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderately Aggressive Balanced is expected to generate 1.06 times more return on investment than Guidepath Managed. However, Moderately Aggressive is 1.06 times more volatile than Guidepath Managed Futures. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guidepath Managed Futures is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,168  in Moderately Aggressive Balanced on May 5, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  91.00  from holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced or generate 7.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Moderately Aggressive Balanced  vs.  Guidepath Managed Futures

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Moderately Aggressive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Moderately Aggressive Balanced are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Moderately Aggressive may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.
Guidepath Managed Futures 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Guidepath Managed Futures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Guidepath Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderately Aggressive and Guidepath Managed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderately Aggressive position performs unexpectedly, Guidepath Managed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidepath Managed will offset losses from the drop in Guidepath Managed's long position.
The idea behind Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Guidepath Managed Futures pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years