Correlation Between Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Salient Alternative Beta, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Balanced with a short position of Salient Alternative. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative

0.99
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Salient is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Salient Alternative Beta in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Salient Alternative Beta and Aggressive Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Salient Alternative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Salient Alternative Beta has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Balanced i.e., Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Balanced Allocation is expected to generate 1.0 times more return on investment than Salient Alternative. However, Aggressive Balanced is 1.0 times more volatile than Salient Alternative Beta. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Salient Alternative Beta is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,218  in Aggressive Balanced Allocation on August 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  31.00  from holding Aggressive Balanced Allocation or generate 2.55% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aggressive Balanced Allocation  vs.  Salient Alternative Beta

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aggressive Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Aggressive Balanced may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Salient Alternative Beta 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Salient Alternative Beta are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Salient Alternative may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Balanced and Salient Alternative positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Salient Alternative can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Salient Alternative will offset losses from the drop in Salient Alternative's long position.
The idea behind Aggressive Balanced Allocation and Salient Alternative Beta pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume