Correlation Between Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commodities Strategy Fund and Aquila Three Peaks, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commodities Strategy with a short position of Aquila Three. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three.

Diversification Opportunities for Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Commodities and Aquila is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commodities Strategy Fund and Aquila Three Peaks in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aquila Three Peaks and Commodities Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commodities Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Aquila Three. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aquila Three Peaks has no effect on the direction of Commodities Strategy i.e., Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three

Assuming the 90 days horizon Commodities Strategy Fund is expected to generate 4.69 times more return on investment than Aquila Three. However, Commodities Strategy is 4.69 times more volatile than Aquila Three Peaks. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aquila Three Peaks is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  15,118  in Commodities Strategy Fund on June 30, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  809.00  from holding Commodities Strategy Fund or generate 5.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Commodities Strategy Fund  vs.  Aquila Three Peaks

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Commodities Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Commodities Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Commodities Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Aquila Three Peaks 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aquila Three Peaks are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Aquila Three is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three

The main advantage of trading using opposite Commodities Strategy and Aquila Three positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commodities Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Aquila Three can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aquila Three will offset losses from the drop in Aquila Three's long position.
The idea behind Commodities Strategy Fund and Aquila Three Peaks pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance