Correlation Between Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Revolution Medicines with a short position of Design Therapeutics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics.

Diversification Opportunities for Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics

-0.43

Correlation Coefficient

Revolution Medicines  Design Therapeutics

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Revolution and Design is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Design Therapeutics and Revolution Medicines is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Revolution Medicines are associated (or correlated) with Design Therapeutics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Design Therapeutics has no effect on the direction of Revolution Medicines i.e., Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Revolution Medicines is expected to generate 28.4 times less return on investment than Design Therapeutics. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Revolution Medicines is 2.39 times less risky than Design Therapeutics. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Design Therapeutics is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  388.00  in Design Therapeutics on May 27, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  132.00  from holding Design Therapeutics or generate 34.02% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Revolution Medicines  vs.  Design Therapeutics

Revolution Medicines

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weakest

Over the last 90 days Revolution Medicines has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound primary indicators, Revolution Medicines is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Design Therapeutics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Design Therapeutics are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak technical and fundamental indicators, Design Therapeutics displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics

The main advantage of trading using opposite Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Revolution Medicines position performs unexpectedly, Design Therapeutics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Design Therapeutics will offset losses from the drop in Design Therapeutics' long position.

The idea behind Revolution Medicines and Design Therapeutics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.