Correlation Between City National and Evaluator Aggressive

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both City National and Evaluator Aggressive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining City National and Evaluator Aggressive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between City National Rochdale and Evaluator Aggressive Rms, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on City National and Evaluator Aggressive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in City National with a short position of Evaluator Aggressive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of City National and Evaluator Aggressive.

Diversification Opportunities for City National and Evaluator Aggressive

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between City and Evaluator is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding City National Rochdale and Evaluator Aggressive Rms in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Evaluator Aggressive Rms and City National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on City National Rochdale are associated (or correlated) with Evaluator Aggressive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Evaluator Aggressive Rms has no effect on the direction of City National i.e., City National and Evaluator Aggressive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between City National and Evaluator Aggressive

Assuming the 90 days horizon City National is expected to generate 3.22 times less return on investment than Evaluator Aggressive. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, City National Rochdale is 7.26 times less risky than Evaluator Aggressive. It trades about 0.58 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Evaluator Aggressive Rms is currently generating about 0.26 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,334  in Evaluator Aggressive Rms on May 2, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  133.00  from holding Evaluator Aggressive Rms or generate 9.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

City National Rochdale  vs.  Evaluator Aggressive Rms

 Performance 
       Timeline  
City National Rochdale 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Excellent

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in City National Rochdale are ranked lower than 45 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, City National is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Evaluator Aggressive Rms 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Evaluator Aggressive Rms are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Evaluator Aggressive may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

City National and Evaluator Aggressive Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with City National and Evaluator Aggressive

The main advantage of trading using opposite City National and Evaluator Aggressive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if City National position performs unexpectedly, Evaluator Aggressive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Evaluator Aggressive will offset losses from the drop in Evaluator Aggressive's long position.
The idea behind City National Rochdale and Evaluator Aggressive Rms pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm