Correlation Between Us Government and Balanced Strategy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Us Government and Balanced Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Us Government and Balanced Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Us Government Securities and Balanced Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Us Government and Balanced Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Us Government with a short position of Balanced Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Us Government and Balanced Strategy.

Diversification Opportunities for Us Government and Balanced Strategy

0.75

Correlation Coefficient

Us Government  Balanced Strategy

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between RGVEX and Balanced is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Us Government Securities and Balanced Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Balanced Strategy and Us Government is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Us Government Securities are associated (or correlated) with Balanced Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Balanced Strategy has no effect on the direction of Us Government i.e., Us Government and Balanced Strategy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Us Government and Balanced Strategy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Us Government is expected to generate 3.58 times less return on investment than Balanced Strategy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Us Government Securities is 1.35 times less risky than Balanced Strategy. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Balanced Strategy Fund is currently generating about 0.24 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,065  in Balanced Strategy Fund on May 8, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  73.00  from holding Balanced Strategy Fund or generate 6.85% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Us Government Securities  vs.  Balanced Strategy Fund

Us Government Securities

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Soft

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Us Government Securities are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Us Government is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Balanced Strategy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Balanced Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Balanced Strategy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

Pair Trading with Us Government and Balanced Strategy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Us Government and Balanced Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Us Government position performs unexpectedly, Balanced Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Balanced Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Balanced Strategy's long position.

The idea behind Us Government Securities and Balanced Strategy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.