Correlation Between Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Balanced Strategy Fund and Guidepath Tactical Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Balanced Strategy with a short position of Guidepath Tactical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical.

Diversification Opportunities for Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Balanced and Guidepath is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Balanced Strategy Fund and Guidepath Tactical Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidepath Tactical and Balanced Strategy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Balanced Strategy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Guidepath Tactical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidepath Tactical has no effect on the direction of Balanced Strategy i.e., Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical

Assuming the 90 days horizon Balanced Strategy is expected to generate 1.04 times less return on investment than Guidepath Tactical. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Balanced Strategy Fund is 1.31 times less risky than Guidepath Tactical. It trades about 0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guidepath Tactical Allocation is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,257  in Guidepath Tactical Allocation on April 29, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  101.00  from holding Guidepath Tactical Allocation or generate 8.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Balanced Strategy Fund  vs.  Guidepath Tactical Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Balanced Strategy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Balanced Strategy Fund are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Balanced Strategy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Guidepath Tactical 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guidepath Tactical Allocation are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Guidepath Tactical may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Balanced Strategy and Guidepath Tactical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Balanced Strategy position performs unexpectedly, Guidepath Tactical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidepath Tactical will offset losses from the drop in Guidepath Tactical's long position.
The idea behind Balanced Strategy Fund and Guidepath Tactical Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals