Correlation Between Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Restaurant Brands International and FAT Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Restaurant Brands with a short position of FAT Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands

-0.27

Correlation Coefficient

Restaurant Brands  FAT Brands

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Restaurant and FAT is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Restaurant Brands Internationa and FAT Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FAT Brands and Restaurant Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with FAT Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FAT Brands has no effect on the direction of Restaurant Brands i.e., Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Restaurant Brands International is expected to generate 0.16 times more return on investment than FAT Brands. However, Restaurant Brands International is 6.39 times less risky than FAT Brands. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FAT Brands is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,713  in Restaurant Brands International on May 6, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  175.50  from holding Restaurant Brands International or generate 2.61% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.41%
Values	Daily Returns

Restaurant Brands Internationa  vs.  FAT Brands

Restaurant Brands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Restaurant Brands International are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

FAT Brands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days FAT Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with abnormal performance in the last few months, the Preferred Stock's fundamental drivers remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in September 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Restaurant Brands and FAT Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, FAT Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FAT Brands will offset losses from the drop in FAT Brands' long position.

The idea behind Restaurant Brands International and FAT Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.