Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Turning Point

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Turning Point at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Turning Point into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Turning Point Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Turning Point and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Turning Point. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Turning Point.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Turning Point

-0.3

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Turning Point

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Turning is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Turning Point Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Turning Point Brands and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Turning Point. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Turning Point Brands has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Turning Point go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Turning Point

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to under-perform the Turning Point. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 3.74 times less risky than Turning Point. The stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Turning Point Brands is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,516  in Turning Point Brands on May 3, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,580  from holding Turning Point Brands or generate 24.25% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Turning Point Brands

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Turning Point Brands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Turning Point Brands are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat abnormal basic indicators, Turning Point sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Turning Point

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Turning Point positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Turning Point can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Turning Point will offset losses from the drop in Turning Point's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble and Turning Point Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.