Correlation Between Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and iShares iBonds Dec, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of IShares IBonds. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds

-0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and IShares is -0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and iShares iBonds Dec in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on iShares iBonds Dec and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with IShares IBonds. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of iShares iBonds Dec has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to under-perform the IShares IBonds. In addition to that, Procter Gamble is 4.55 times more volatile than iShares iBonds Dec. It trades about -0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. iShares iBonds Dec is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,157  in iShares iBonds Dec on May 6, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding iShares iBonds Dec or generate 1.48% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.41%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  iShares iBonds Dec

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
iShares iBonds Dec 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares iBonds Dec are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively steady basic indicators, IShares IBonds is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price chaos, may contribute to medium-term losses for the stakeholders.

Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and IShares IBonds positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, IShares IBonds can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IShares IBonds will offset losses from the drop in IShares IBonds' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and iShares iBonds Dec pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm