Correlation Between Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Asset Management and Infrastructure Fund Institutional, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Asset with a short position of Infrastructure Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund

1.0

Correlation Coefficient

Strategic Asset  Infrastructure Fund

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Infrastructure is 1.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Asset Management and Infrastructure Fund Institutio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Infrastructure Fund and Strategic Asset is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Asset Management are associated (or correlated) with Infrastructure Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Infrastructure Fund has no effect on the direction of Strategic Asset i.e., Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Asset is expected to generate 1.09 times less return on investment than Infrastructure Fund. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Strategic Asset Management is 1.0 times less risky than Infrastructure Fund. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Infrastructure Fund Institutional is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,303  in Infrastructure Fund Institutional on April 30, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  88.00  from holding Infrastructure Fund Institutional or generate 3.82% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Strategic Asset Management  vs.  Infrastructure Fund Institutio

Strategic Asset Mana

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Asset Management are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Asset is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Infrastructure Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Infrastructure Fund Institutional are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Infrastructure Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Asset and Infrastructure Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Asset position performs unexpectedly, Infrastructure Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Infrastructure Fund will offset losses from the drop in Infrastructure Fund's long position.

The idea behind Strategic Asset Management and Infrastructure Fund Institutional pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Directory module to find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges.