Correlation Between Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Oxford Square Capital and Goldman Sachs BDC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Oxford Square with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs

-0.05
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Oxford and Goldman is -0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Oxford Square Capital and Goldman Sachs BDC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs BDC and Oxford Square is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Oxford Square Capital are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs BDC has no effect on the direction of Oxford Square i.e., Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Oxford Square is expected to generate 43.0 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Oxford Square Capital is 1.17 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs BDC is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  997.00  in Goldman Sachs BDC on May 7, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  114.00  from holding Goldman Sachs BDC or generate 11.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Oxford Square Capital  vs.  Goldman Sachs BDC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Oxford Square Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weakest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Oxford Square Capital has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Oxford Square is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Goldman Sachs BDC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs BDC are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental drivers, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Oxford Square and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Oxford Square position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Oxford Square Capital and Goldman Sachs BDC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world