Correlation Between OMX Helsinki and EGX 33
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between OMX Helsinki 25 and EGX 33 Shariah, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on OMX Helsinki and EGX 33 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in OMX Helsinki with a short position of EGX 33. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of OMX Helsinki and EGX 33.
Diversification Opportunities for OMX Helsinki and EGX 33
0.36 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between OMX and EGX is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding OMX Helsinki 25 and EGX 33 Shariah in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on EGX 33 Shariah and OMX Helsinki is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on OMX Helsinki 25 are associated (or correlated) with EGX 33. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of EGX 33 Shariah has no effect on the direction of OMX Helsinki i.e., OMX Helsinki and EGX 33 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between OMX Helsinki and EGX 33
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon OMX Helsinki 25 is expected to under-perform the EGX 33. In addition to that, OMX Helsinki is 1.21 times more volatile than EGX 33 Shariah. It trades about -0.06 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. EGX 33 Shariah is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 314,689 in EGX 33 Shariah on January 4, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 17,617 from holding EGX 33 Shariah or generate 5.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 76.56% |
Values | Daily Returns |
OMX Helsinki 25 vs. EGX 33 Shariah
Performance |
Timeline |
OMX Helsinki and EGX 33 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
OMX Helsinki 25
Pair trading matchups for OMX Helsinki
EGX 33 Shariah
Pair trading matchups for EGX 33
Pair Trading with OMX Helsinki and EGX 33
The main advantage of trading using opposite OMX Helsinki and EGX 33 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if OMX Helsinki position performs unexpectedly, EGX 33 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in EGX 33 will offset losses from the drop in EGX 33's long position.OMX Helsinki vs. Trainers House Oyj | OMX Helsinki vs. Remedy Entertainment Oyj | OMX Helsinki vs. Aktia Bank Abp | OMX Helsinki vs. Nordea Bank Abp |
EGX 33 vs. Paint Chemicals Industries | EGX 33 vs. Saudi Egyptian Investment | EGX 33 vs. National Drilling | EGX 33 vs. Digitize for Investment |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets |