Correlation Between NYSE Composite and Global E

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both NYSE Composite and Global E at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining NYSE Composite and Global E into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between NYSE Composite and Global E Portfolio, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on NYSE Composite and Global E and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in NYSE Composite with a short position of Global E. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of NYSE Composite and Global E.

Diversification Opportunities for NYSE Composite and Global E

0.94

Correlation Coefficient

NYSE Composite  Global E

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between NYSE and Global is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding NYSE Composite and Global E Portfolio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global E Portfolio and NYSE Composite is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on NYSE Composite are associated (or correlated) with Global E. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global E Portfolio has no effect on the direction of NYSE Composite i.e., NYSE Composite and Global E go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between NYSE Composite and Global E

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon NYSE Composite is expected to generate 3.48 times less return on investment than Global E. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, NYSE Composite is 1.26 times less risky than Global E. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global E Portfolio is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,997  in Global E Portfolio on August 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  45.00  from holding Global E Portfolio or generate 2.25% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

NYSE Composite  vs.  Global E Portfolio

Pair Trading with NYSE Composite and Global E

The main advantage of trading using opposite NYSE Composite and Global E positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if NYSE Composite position performs unexpectedly, Global E can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global E will offset losses from the drop in Global E's long position.

The idea behind NYSE Composite and Global E Portfolio pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.