Correlation Between MFS Municipal and John Hancock

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MFS Municipal and John Hancock at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MFS Municipal and John Hancock into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MFS Municipal Income and John Hancock Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MFS Municipal and John Hancock and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MFS Municipal with a short position of John Hancock. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MFS Municipal and John Hancock.

Diversification Opportunities for MFS Municipal and John Hancock

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between MFS and John is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MFS Municipal Income and John Hancock Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on John Hancock Income and MFS Municipal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MFS Municipal Income are associated (or correlated) with John Hancock. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of John Hancock Income has no effect on the direction of MFS Municipal i.e., MFS Municipal and John Hancock go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MFS Municipal and John Hancock

Considering the 90-day investment horizon MFS Municipal Income is expected to under-perform the John Hancock. In addition to that, MFS Municipal is 1.46 times more volatile than John Hancock Income. It trades about -0.06 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. John Hancock Income is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,096  in John Hancock Income on January 9, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (15.00) from holding John Hancock Income or give up 1.37% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

MFS Municipal Income  vs.  John Hancock Income

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MFS Municipal Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days MFS Municipal Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, MFS Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
John Hancock Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days John Hancock Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, John Hancock is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

MFS Municipal and John Hancock Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MFS Municipal and John Hancock

The main advantage of trading using opposite MFS Municipal and John Hancock positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MFS Municipal position performs unexpectedly, John Hancock can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in John Hancock will offset losses from the drop in John Hancock's long position.
The idea behind MFS Municipal Income and John Hancock Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings