Correlation Between Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy and Catalystcifc Floating Rate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Catalyst/millburn with a short position of Catalyst/cifc Floating. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating.
Diversification Opportunities for Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating
0.75 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Catalystmillburn Hedge Strateg and Catalystcifc Floating Rate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Catalyst/cifc Floating and Catalyst/millburn is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy are associated (or correlated) with Catalyst/cifc Floating. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Catalyst/cifc Floating has no effect on the direction of Catalyst/millburn i.e., Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating
Assuming the 90 days horizon Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy is expected to generate 4.2 times more return on investment than Catalyst/cifc Floating. However, Catalyst/millburn is 4.2 times more volatile than Catalystcifc Floating Rate. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Catalystcifc Floating Rate is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest 3,663 in Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy on May 19, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 86.00 from holding Catalystmillburn Hedge Strategy or generate 2.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Catalystmillburn Hedge Strateg vs. Catalystcifc Floating Rate
Performance |
Timeline |
Catalystmillburn Hedge |
Catalyst/cifc Floating |
Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating
The main advantage of trading using opposite Catalyst/millburn and Catalyst/cifc Floating positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Catalyst/millburn position performs unexpectedly, Catalyst/cifc Floating can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Catalyst/cifc Floating will offset losses from the drop in Catalyst/cifc Floating's long position.Catalyst/millburn vs. Dreyfus Technology Growth | Catalyst/millburn vs. Putnam Global Technology | Catalyst/millburn vs. Vanguard Information Technology | Catalyst/millburn vs. Invesco Technology Fund |
Catalyst/cifc Floating vs. Gmo Equity Allocation | Catalyst/cifc Floating vs. Rational Strategic Allocation | Catalyst/cifc Floating vs. Principal Lifetime Hybrid | Catalyst/cifc Floating vs. Us Large Pany |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities |