Correlation Between Scharf Balanced and Calvert International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scharf Balanced and Calvert International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scharf Balanced and Calvert International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scharf Balanced Opportunity and Calvert International Equity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scharf Balanced and Calvert International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scharf Balanced with a short position of Calvert International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scharf Balanced and Calvert International.

Diversification Opportunities for Scharf Balanced and Calvert International

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scharf and Calvert is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scharf Balanced Opportunity and Calvert International Equity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert International and Scharf Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scharf Balanced Opportunity are associated (or correlated) with Calvert International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert International has no effect on the direction of Scharf Balanced i.e., Scharf Balanced and Calvert International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scharf Balanced and Calvert International

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scharf Balanced Opportunity is expected to generate 0.47 times more return on investment than Calvert International. However, Scharf Balanced Opportunity is 2.12 times less risky than Calvert International. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert International Equity is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,814  in Scharf Balanced Opportunity on July 16, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  80.00  from holding Scharf Balanced Opportunity or generate 2.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scharf Balanced Opportunity  vs.  Calvert International Equity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scharf Balanced Oppo 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Scharf Balanced Opportunity are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Scharf Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Calvert International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert International Equity are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Calvert International is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Scharf Balanced and Calvert International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scharf Balanced and Calvert International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scharf Balanced and Calvert International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scharf Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Calvert International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert International will offset losses from the drop in Calvert International's long position.
The idea behind Scharf Balanced Opportunity and Calvert International Equity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm