Correlation Between Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Qs Defensive Growth and Dynamic Allocation Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Qs Defensive with a short position of Dynamic Allocation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation.

Diversification Opportunities for Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation

0.97

Correlation Coefficient

Qs Defensive  Dynamic Allocation

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between LMLRX and Dynamic is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Qs Defensive Growth and Dynamic Allocation Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dynamic Allocation and Qs Defensive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Qs Defensive Growth are associated (or correlated) with Dynamic Allocation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dynamic Allocation has no effect on the direction of Qs Defensive i.e., Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation

Assuming the 90 days horizon Qs Defensive is expected to generate 1.4 times less return on investment than Dynamic Allocation. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Qs Defensive Growth is 1.45 times less risky than Dynamic Allocation. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Dynamic Allocation Fund is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,041  in Dynamic Allocation Fund on May 19, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  54.00  from holding Dynamic Allocation Fund or generate 5.19% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Qs Defensive Growth  vs.  Dynamic Allocation Fund

Qs Defensive Growth

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Qs Defensive Growth are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Qs Defensive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Dynamic Allocation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dynamic Allocation Fund are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Dynamic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Qs Defensive and Dynamic Allocation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Qs Defensive position performs unexpectedly, Dynamic Allocation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dynamic Allocation will offset losses from the drop in Dynamic Allocation's long position.

The idea behind Qs Defensive Growth and Dynamic Allocation Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.