Correlation Between Qs Defensive and Financial Services

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Qs Defensive and Financial Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Qs Defensive and Financial Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Qs Defensive Growth and Financial Services Portfolio, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Qs Defensive and Financial Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Qs Defensive with a short position of Financial Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Qs Defensive and Financial Services.

Diversification Opportunities for Qs Defensive and Financial Services

0.95
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between LMLRX and Financial is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Qs Defensive Growth and Financial Services Portfolio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Financial Services and Qs Defensive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Qs Defensive Growth are associated (or correlated) with Financial Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Financial Services has no effect on the direction of Qs Defensive i.e., Qs Defensive and Financial Services go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Qs Defensive and Financial Services

Assuming the 90 days horizon Qs Defensive is expected to generate 1.92 times less return on investment than Financial Services. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Qs Defensive Growth is 2.75 times less risky than Financial Services. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Financial Services Portfolio is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,176  in Financial Services Portfolio on May 2, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  98.00  from holding Financial Services Portfolio or generate 8.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Qs Defensive Growth  vs.  Financial Services Portfolio

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Qs Defensive Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Qs Defensive Growth are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Qs Defensive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Financial Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial Services Portfolio are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financial Services may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Qs Defensive and Financial Services Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Qs Defensive and Financial Services

The main advantage of trading using opposite Qs Defensive and Financial Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Qs Defensive position performs unexpectedly, Financial Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Financial Services will offset losses from the drop in Financial Services' long position.
The idea behind Qs Defensive Growth and Financial Services Portfolio pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance