Correlation Between Gladstone Land and Penn National

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gladstone Land and Penn National at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gladstone Land and Penn National into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gladstone Land and Penn National Gaming, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gladstone Land and Penn National and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gladstone Land with a short position of Penn National. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gladstone Land and Penn National.

Diversification Opportunities for Gladstone Land and Penn National

0.06

Correlation Coefficient

Gladstone Land  Penn National

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gladstone and Penn is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gladstone Land and Penn National Gaming in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Penn National Gaming and Gladstone Land is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gladstone Land are associated (or correlated) with Penn National. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Penn National Gaming has no effect on the direction of Gladstone Land i.e., Gladstone Land and Penn National go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gladstone Land and Penn National

Assuming the 90 days horizon Gladstone Land is expected to under-perform the Penn National. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Gladstone Land is 3.97 times less risky than Penn National. The preferred stock trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Penn National Gaming is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,583  in Penn National Gaming on May 5, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  197.00  from holding Penn National Gaming or generate 12.44% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Gladstone Land  vs.  Penn National Gaming

Gladstone Land

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Gladstone Land has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable fundamental indicators, Gladstone Land is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Penn National Gaming

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile basic indicators, Penn National displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Gladstone Land and Penn National

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gladstone Land and Penn National positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gladstone Land position performs unexpectedly, Penn National can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Penn National will offset losses from the drop in Penn National's long position.

The idea behind Gladstone Land and Penn National Gaming pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.