Correlation Between InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in InfuSystems Holdings with a short position of Spring Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley

-0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between InfuSystems and Spring is -0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Valley Acquisition and InfuSystems Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on InfuSystems Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Spring Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Valley Acquisition has no effect on the direction of InfuSystems Holdings i.e., InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley

Given the investment horizon of 90 days InfuSystems Holdings is expected to generate 9.77 times less return on investment than Spring Valley. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, InfuSystems Holdings is 5.22 times less risky than Spring Valley. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Valley Acquisition is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9.50  in Spring Valley Acquisition on May 7, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  18.50  from holding Spring Valley Acquisition or generate 194.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy72.58%
ValuesDaily Returns

InfuSystems Holdings  vs.  Spring Valley Acquisition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
InfuSystems Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in InfuSystems Holdings are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, InfuSystems Holdings unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Spring Valley Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Spring Valley Acquisition are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively weak forward indicators, Spring Valley reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if InfuSystems Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Spring Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Valley will offset losses from the drop in Spring Valley's long position.
The idea behind InfuSystems Holdings and Spring Valley Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA