Correlation Between Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Intermediate Bond Fund and Strategic Advisers Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Intermediate Bond with a short position of Strategic Advisers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers.

Diversification Opportunities for Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Intermediate and Strategic is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Intermediate Bond Fund and Strategic Advisers Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Bond is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Intermediate Bond Fund are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Advisers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Advisers has no effect on the direction of Intermediate Bond i.e., Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers

Assuming the 90 days horizon Intermediate Bond Fund is expected to generate 1.17 times more return on investment than Strategic Advisers. However, Intermediate Bond is 1.17 times more volatile than Strategic Advisers Municipal. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Advisers Municipal is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,271  in Intermediate Bond Fund on September 17, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3.00  from holding Intermediate Bond Fund or generate 0.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Intermediate Bond Fund  vs.  Strategic Advisers Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Intermediate Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Mild

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Intermediate Bond Fund are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Intermediate Bond is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Strategic Advisers 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Advisers Municipal are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Advisers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Intermediate Bond and Strategic Advisers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Intermediate Bond position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Advisers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Advisers will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Advisers' long position.
The idea behind Intermediate Bond Fund and Strategic Advisers Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins