Correlation Between Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hannon Armstrong Sustainable and Iron Mountain Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hannon Armstrong with a short position of Iron Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain

0.72

Correlation Coefficient

Hannon Armstrong  Iron Mountain

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hannon and Iron is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hannon Armstrong Sustainable and Iron Mountain Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Iron Mountain and Hannon Armstrong is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hannon Armstrong Sustainable are associated (or correlated) with Iron Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Iron Mountain has no effect on the direction of Hannon Armstrong i.e., Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Hannon Armstrong is expected to generate 1.96 times less return on investment than Iron Mountain. In addition to that, Hannon Armstrong is 2.24 times more volatile than Iron Mountain Incorporated. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Iron Mountain Incorporated is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  4,231  in Iron Mountain Incorporated on June 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,305  from holding Iron Mountain Incorporated or generate 172.65% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Hannon Armstrong Sustainable  vs.  Iron Mountain Incorporated

Hannon Armstrong Sus

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hannon Armstrong Sustainable are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak basic indicators, Hannon Armstrong demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Iron Mountain

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Iron Mountain Incorporated are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Iron Mountain displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hannon Armstrong and Iron Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hannon Armstrong position performs unexpectedly, Iron Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Iron Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Iron Mountain's long position.

The idea behind Hannon Armstrong Sustainable and Iron Mountain Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..