Correlation Between Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Greenland Acquisition Corp and Red Cat Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Greenland Acquisition with a short position of Red Cat. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat.

Diversification Opportunities for Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat

-0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Greenland and Red is -0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Greenland Acquisition Corp and Red Cat Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Red Cat Holdings and Greenland Acquisition is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Greenland Acquisition Corp are associated (or correlated) with Red Cat. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Red Cat Holdings has no effect on the direction of Greenland Acquisition i.e., Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Greenland Acquisition Corp is expected to under-perform the Red Cat. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Greenland Acquisition Corp is 2.13 times less risky than Red Cat. The stock trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Red Cat Holdings is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  554.00  in Red Cat Holdings on May 5, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  266.00  from holding Red Cat Holdings or generate 48.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Greenland Acquisition Corp  vs.  Red Cat Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Greenland Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Greenland Acquisition Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in September 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Red Cat Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Red Cat Holdings are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Red Cat unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat

The main advantage of trading using opposite Greenland Acquisition and Red Cat positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Greenland Acquisition position performs unexpectedly, Red Cat can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Red Cat will offset losses from the drop in Red Cat's long position.
The idea behind Greenland Acquisition Corp and Red Cat Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum