Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs High and Calvert Global Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Calvert Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Calvert is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs High and Calvert Global Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Global Energy and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs High are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Global Energy has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 4.74 times less return on investment than Calvert Global. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs High is 4.15 times less risky than Calvert Global. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Global Energy is currently generating about 0.33 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,078  in Calvert Global Energy on May 1, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  197.00  from holding Calvert Global Energy or generate 18.27% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs High  vs.  Calvert Global Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs High 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs High are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Calvert Global Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Global Energy are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Calvert Global showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Calvert Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Global will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Global's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs High and Calvert Global Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets