Correlation Between Gorman Rupp and John Bean

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gorman Rupp and John Bean at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gorman Rupp and John Bean into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gorman Rupp and John Bean Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gorman Rupp and John Bean and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gorman Rupp with a short position of John Bean. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gorman Rupp and John Bean.

Diversification Opportunities for Gorman Rupp and John Bean

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gorman and John is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gorman Rupp and John Bean Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on John Bean Technologies and Gorman Rupp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gorman Rupp are associated (or correlated) with John Bean. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of John Bean Technologies has no effect on the direction of Gorman Rupp i.e., Gorman Rupp and John Bean go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gorman Rupp and John Bean

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Gorman Rupp is expected to generate 2.1 times less return on investment than John Bean. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Gorman Rupp is 1.72 times less risky than John Bean. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. John Bean Technologies is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,907  in John Bean Technologies on August 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,516  from holding John Bean Technologies or generate 15.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Gorman Rupp  vs.  John Bean Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Gorman Rupp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gorman Rupp are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak basic indicators, Gorman Rupp exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
John Bean Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in John Bean Technologies are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain fundamental drivers, John Bean unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Gorman Rupp and John Bean Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Gorman Rupp and John Bean

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gorman Rupp and John Bean positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gorman Rupp position performs unexpectedly, John Bean can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in John Bean will offset losses from the drop in John Bean's long position.
The idea behind Gorman Rupp and John Bean Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity