Correlation Between Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities and Towpath Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Strategic with a short position of Towpath Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Towpath is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Strategic Opportuni and Towpath Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Towpath Technology and Guggenheim Strategic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities are associated (or correlated) with Towpath Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Towpath Technology has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Strategic i.e., Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Towpath Technology. However, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities is 1.49 times less risky than Towpath Technology. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Towpath Technology is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,399  in Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities on May 6, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  94.00  from holding Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities or generate 6.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guggenheim Strategic Opportuni  vs.  Towpath Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guggenheim Strategic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly inconsistent basic indicators, Guggenheim Strategic may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.
Towpath Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Towpath Technology are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Towpath Technology is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Strategic and Towpath Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Strategic position performs unexpectedly, Towpath Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Towpath Technology will offset losses from the drop in Towpath Technology's long position.
The idea behind Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities and Towpath Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences