Correlation Between GM and Fortress Transportation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Fortress Transportation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Fortress Transportation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Fortress Transportation and, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Fortress Transportation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Fortress Transportation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Fortress Transportation.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Fortress Transportation

0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Fortress is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Fortress Transportation and in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fortress Transportation and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Fortress Transportation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fortress Transportation has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Fortress Transportation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Fortress Transportation

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 4.36 times more return on investment than Fortress Transportation. However, GM is 4.36 times more volatile than Fortress Transportation and. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fortress Transportation and is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,533  in General Motors on May 7, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  744.00  from holding General Motors or generate 16.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Fortress Transportation and

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Fortress Transportation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fortress Transportation and are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Fortress Transportation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

GM and Fortress Transportation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Fortress Transportation

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Fortress Transportation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Fortress Transportation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fortress Transportation will offset losses from the drop in Fortress Transportation's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Fortress Transportation and pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance