Correlation Between GM and Stone Harbor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Stone Harbor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Stone Harbor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Stone Harbor Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Stone Harbor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Stone Harbor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Stone Harbor.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Stone Harbor

0.77
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Stone is 0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Stone Harbor Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stone Harbor Emerging and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Stone Harbor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stone Harbor Emerging has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Stone Harbor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Stone Harbor

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 3.15 times more return on investment than Stone Harbor. However, GM is 3.15 times more volatile than Stone Harbor Emerging. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stone Harbor Emerging is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,532  in General Motors on May 6, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  721.00  from holding General Motors or generate 15.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Stone Harbor Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Stone Harbor Emerging are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

GM and Stone Harbor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Stone Harbor

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Stone Harbor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Stone Harbor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stone Harbor will offset losses from the drop in Stone Harbor's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Stone Harbor Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital