Correlation Between GameSquare Holdings and Reading International

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GameSquare Holdings and Reading International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GameSquare Holdings and Reading International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between GameSquare Holdings and Reading International B, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GameSquare Holdings and Reading International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GameSquare Holdings with a short position of Reading International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GameSquare Holdings and Reading International.

Diversification Opportunities for GameSquare Holdings and Reading International

-0.57

Correlation Coefficient

GameSquare Holdings  Reading International

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GameSquare and Reading is -0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GameSquare Holdings and Reading International B in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Reading International and GameSquare Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GameSquare Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Reading International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Reading International has no effect on the direction of GameSquare Holdings i.e., GameSquare Holdings and Reading International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GameSquare Holdings and Reading International

Given the investment horizon of 90 days GameSquare Holdings is expected to generate 1.95 times more return on investment than Reading International. However, GameSquare Holdings is 1.95 times more volatile than Reading International B. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Reading International B is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  97.00  in GameSquare Holdings on July 7, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (13.00) from holding GameSquare Holdings or give up 13.4% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	98.46%
Values	Daily Returns

GameSquare Holdings  vs.  Reading International B

GameSquare Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Soft

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in GameSquare Holdings are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain primary indicators, GameSquare Holdings exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Reading International

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Soft

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Reading International B are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak forward indicators, Reading International sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with GameSquare Holdings and Reading International

The main advantage of trading using opposite GameSquare Holdings and Reading International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GameSquare Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Reading International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Reading International will offset losses from the drop in Reading International's long position.

The idea behind GameSquare Holdings and Reading International B pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.