Correlation Between Gambling and Churchill Downs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gambling and Churchill Downs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gambling and Churchill Downs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gambling Group and Churchill Downs Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gambling and Churchill Downs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gambling with a short position of Churchill Downs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gambling and Churchill Downs.

Diversification Opportunities for Gambling and Churchill Downs

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gambling and Churchill is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gambling Group and Churchill Downs Incorporated in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Churchill Downs and Gambling is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gambling Group are associated (or correlated) with Churchill Downs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Churchill Downs has no effect on the direction of Gambling i.e., Gambling and Churchill Downs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gambling and Churchill Downs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Gambling Group is expected to generate 1.87 times more return on investment than Churchill Downs. However, Gambling is 1.87 times more volatile than Churchill Downs Incorporated. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Churchill Downs Incorporated is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  784.00  in Gambling Group on August 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  248.00  from holding Gambling Group or generate 31.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Gambling Group  vs.  Churchill Downs Incorporated

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Gambling Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gambling Group are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unfluctuating primary indicators, Gambling sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Churchill Downs 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Churchill Downs Incorporated are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Churchill Downs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Gambling and Churchill Downs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Gambling and Churchill Downs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gambling and Churchill Downs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gambling position performs unexpectedly, Churchill Downs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Churchill Downs will offset losses from the drop in Churchill Downs' long position.
The idea behind Gambling Group and Churchill Downs Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets