Correlation Between Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Advisers Income and Intermediate Government Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Advisers with a short position of Intermediate Government. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government

0.9

Correlation Coefficient

Strategic Advisers  Intermediate Government

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Intermediate is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Advisers Income and Intermediate Government Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Intermediate Government and Strategic Advisers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Advisers Income are associated (or correlated) with Intermediate Government. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Intermediate Government has no effect on the direction of Strategic Advisers i.e., Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Advisers Income is expected to generate 1.35 times more return on investment than Intermediate Government. However, Strategic Advisers is 1.35 times more volatile than Intermediate Government Bond. It trades about 0.33 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Intermediate Government Bond is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest  862.00  in Strategic Advisers Income on May 19, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  31.00  from holding Strategic Advisers Income or generate 3.6% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Strategic Advisers Income  vs.  Intermediate Government Bond

Strategic Advisers Income

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Advisers Income are ranked lower than 25 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Advisers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Intermediate Government

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Intermediate Government Bond are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Intermediate Government is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Advisers and Intermediate Government positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Advisers position performs unexpectedly, Intermediate Government can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Intermediate Government will offset losses from the drop in Intermediate Government's long position.

The idea behind Strategic Advisers Income and Intermediate Government Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..