Correlation Between MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MicroSectors FANG Index and Energy Select Sector, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MicroSectors FANG with a short position of Energy Select. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select.
Diversification Opportunities for MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select
-0.5 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between MicroSectors and Energy is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MicroSectors FANG Index and Energy Select Sector in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Select Sector and MicroSectors FANG is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MicroSectors FANG Index are associated (or correlated) with Energy Select. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Select Sector has no effect on the direction of MicroSectors FANG i.e., MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select
Given the investment horizon of 90 days MicroSectors FANG Index is expected to under-perform the Energy Select. But the etf apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, MicroSectors FANG Index is 2.0 times less risky than Energy Select. The etf trades about -0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Energy Select Sector is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 8,132 in Energy Select Sector on May 2, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 636.00 from holding Energy Select Sector or generate 7.82% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 22.95% |
Values | Daily Returns |
MicroSectors FANG Index vs. Energy Select Sector
Performance |
Timeline |
MicroSectors FANG Index |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Very Weak
Weak | Strong |
Energy Select Sector |
MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select
The main advantage of trading using opposite MicroSectors FANG and Energy Select positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MicroSectors FANG position performs unexpectedly, Energy Select can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Select will offset losses from the drop in Energy Select's long position.MicroSectors FANG vs. Direxion Daily Semiconductor | MicroSectors FANG vs. MicroSectors Solactive FANG | MicroSectors FANG vs. MicroSectors FANG Index | MicroSectors FANG vs. Direxion Daily Technology |
Energy Select vs. iShares Basic Materials | Energy Select vs. iShares Utilities ETF | Energy Select vs. iShares Financials ETF | Energy Select vs. iShares Healthcare ETF |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk |