Correlation Between Flutter Entertainment and Full House

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Flutter Entertainment and Full House at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Flutter Entertainment and Full House into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Flutter Entertainment plc and Full House Resorts, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Flutter Entertainment and Full House and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Flutter Entertainment with a short position of Full House. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Flutter Entertainment and Full House.

Diversification Opportunities for Flutter Entertainment and Full House

0.76

Correlation Coefficient

Flutter Entertainment  Full House

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Flutter and Full is 0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Flutter Entertainment plc and Full House Resorts in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Full House Resorts and Flutter Entertainment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Flutter Entertainment plc are associated (or correlated) with Full House. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Full House Resorts has no effect on the direction of Flutter Entertainment i.e., Flutter Entertainment and Full House go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Flutter Entertainment and Full House

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Flutter Entertainment is expected to generate 1.56 times less return on investment than Full House. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Flutter Entertainment plc is 2.16 times less risky than Full House. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Full House Resorts is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  325.00  in Full House Resorts on May 7, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  125.00  from holding Full House Resorts or generate 38.46% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Flutter Entertainment plc  vs.  Full House Resorts

Flutter Entertainment plc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Flutter Entertainment plc are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal basic indicators, Flutter Entertainment unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Full House Resorts

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Full House Resorts are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite weak essential indicators, Full House disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Flutter Entertainment and Full House

The main advantage of trading using opposite Flutter Entertainment and Full House positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Flutter Entertainment position performs unexpectedly, Full House can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Full House will offset losses from the drop in Full House's long position.

The idea behind Flutter Entertainment plc and Full House Resorts pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.