Correlation Between Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lazard Emerging Markets and Columbia Global Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lazard Emerging with a short position of Columbia Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global

0.88
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lazard and Columbia is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lazard Emerging Markets and Columbia Global Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Global Tech and Lazard Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lazard Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Global Tech has no effect on the direction of Lazard Emerging i.e., Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Lazard Emerging Markets is expected to generate 1.46 times more return on investment than Columbia Global. However, Lazard Emerging is 1.46 times more volatile than Columbia Global Technology. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Global Technology is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  893.00  in Lazard Emerging Markets on July 3, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  397.00  from holding Lazard Emerging Markets or generate 44.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lazard Emerging Markets  vs.  Columbia Global Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lazard Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lazard Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Lazard Emerging may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in November 2025.
Columbia Global Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Global Technology are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Columbia Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lazard Emerging and Columbia Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lazard Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Global will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Global's long position.
The idea behind Lazard Emerging Markets and Columbia Global Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing